4 results
3 Intensive Clinical Treatment and Rehabilitation for Veterans with Traumatic Brain Injury and Psychological Health Problems
- Charles E Gaudet, Grant L Iverson, Emily J Lubin, Lauren H Brenner, Ross Zafonte, Mary A Iaccarino
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 29 / Issue s1 / November 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 21 December 2023, pp. 115-116
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Objective:
Some active-duty military service members and veterans experience combinations of persistent traumatic stress, depression, suicidal ideation, anger, aggressive behavior, substance misuse, sleep disturbance, complicated grief, moral injury, headaches and migraines, chronic bodily pain, and cognitive weakness or deficits. The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical outcomes of active-duty service members and veterans who have completed the traumatic brain injury (TBI) and brain health track of a two-week intensive clinical treatment and rehabilitation program.
Participants and Methods:The sample included 141 participants, with a history of TBI, in the Intensive Clinical Program (ICP). The ICP is a multidisciplinary, two-week treatment and rehabilitation program for active duty service members and veterans with complex psychological, cognitive, and physical health concerns. The program is comprised of daily individual therapy, group psychotherapy, psychoeducation, skills-building groups, and complementary and alternative medicine treatments. Participants in the ICP completed the following measures prior to initiating treatment and immediately following completion of treatment: Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Self-Efficacy for Symptom Management Scale (SE-SMS), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Satisfaction with Participation in Social Roles and Activities-Short Form 8a, version 1.0 (PROMIS-S). Wilcoxon signed ranks tests were used to examine differences in scores on self-report measures from pretreatment to posttreatment for the full sample and within three subgroups stratified by age (in years: 20-34; 35-45; and 46-66). For the NSI, changes in the proportion of participants endorsing moderate or worse levels of individual symptoms from pretreatment to posttreatment were assessed using McNemar’s tests. Alpha levels were set at p<0.05 for all analyses.
Results:Participants reported statistically significant improvements across all of the administered measures (NSI, PCL-5, PHQ-9, PROMIS-S, and SE-SMS) upon conclusion of treatment. Effect sizes ranged from medium to large (d=0.34-1.04) for the full sample. Effect sizes were largely consistent across age subgroups (20-34: d=0.32-1.05; 35-45: d=0.55-0.96; 46-66: d=0.28-1.05). The magnitude of change on the SE-SMS appeared to be less with increasing age (20-34: d=1.05; 35-45: d=0.69; 46-66: d=0.28). Individual item analyses for the NSI revealed statistically significant reductions in the proportion of participants endorsing moderate or greater severity from pretreatment to posttreatment for 18 of 22 symptoms.
Conclusions:Active duty service members and veterans participating in the two-week TBI and brain health intensive clinical program reported considerable symptom reduction at the conclusion of the program. Further research is indicated to assess the durability of symptom reduction.
72 Investigating Handedness and Cognitive Functions in People with Severe Mental Disorders
- Rune Raudeberg, Åsa Hammar, Marco Hirnstein, Charles E. Gaudet, Grant L. Iverson
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 29 / Issue s1 / November 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 21 December 2023, pp. 856-857
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Objective:
Our objective is to investigate whether handedness is associated with performance on verbal and visual neuropsychological tests in people with severe mental disorders. A recent study, applying a continuous scale of hand preference, reports that handedness is not associated with test performance in people with schizophrenia disorders. Conversely, in a recent large meta-analysis where handedness was applied as a dichotomous variable, right-handers had better performance in spatial ability (but not verbal ability) compared to left-handers, irrespective of gender or health status. We hypothesize that a dichotomous classification of handedness will reveal an advantage of right-handedness on tests of visuospatial functions—but not verbal functions—in people with severe mental disorders. We expect that gender will not be associated with the neuropsychological test results.
Participants and Methods:Data from a sample of 385 patients with severe mental disorders, mainly within the schizophrenia spectrum, were analyzed. All participants had Norwegian as their first language. Their mean age was 24.8 years (SD=6.2) and 153 (39.7%) were women. Handedness was evaluated by observation of preferred hand in writing and drawing during neuropsychological assessment. Chi-square tests were used to compare proportions of cases with reported frequencies of handedness in the general population and comparable clinical samples. Raw scores on Semantic Fluency and Line Orientation from the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U tests, and possible effects of gender with two-way ANOVA. Frequencies of low scores were analyzed using frequency analyses.
Results:Overall prevalence of left-handers was 10.4% compared to 10.6% in the general population (χ2=.018, p=.893). Observed prevalence for women was 9.2% compared to expected prevalence of 9.5% (χ2=.026, p=.873) and for men 10.7% and 11.6%, respectively (χ2=.039, p=.844). There was a significant difference in Line Orientation scores (Mdright-handers=18, Mdleft-handers=17; U=5268.0, p=.013) but not Semantic Fluency scores (Mdright-handers=17, Mdleft-handers=18.5; U=7568.5, p=.315). Right-handed men had higher scores on Line Orientation but there was no handedness by gender interaction (F(1)=1.69, p=.194). For Semantic Fluency, left-handed men had higher scores and a gender by handedness interaction was found (F(1)=7.21, p=.008). Using scores corresponding to <5th percentile, 15% of left-handers and 8% of right-handers had scores <5th percentile on Line Orientation, as opposed to 15% and 14% on Semantic Fluency.
Conclusions:Right-handers had significantly better performance on a test measuring visuospatial function, irrespective of gender. Left-handers had about twice the number of scores in the impaired range (i.e., <5th percentile) compared to right-handers. Left-handed men had better performance on a test of verbal functions, which was unexpected. A recent study reported no right-hand associated advantage on visuospatial tests in people with schizophrenia disorders when measuring handedness on a continuous scale. This suggests that the classification of handedness as either a dichotomous or as a continuous variable is important in studies of handedness and cognitive functions.
1 Perceived Cognitive Impairment in High School Students in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Ila A. Iverson, Charles E Gaudet III, Nathan E. Cook
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 29 / Issue s1 / November 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 21 December 2023, pp. 874-875
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Objective:
The Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), conducted by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 2019, revealed that a large percentage of boys (30%) and girls (45%) reported serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions as a result of a physical, mental, or emotional problem. In 2021, the CDC conducted the Adolescent Behaviors and Experiences Survey (ABES). The ABES included similar methodology and content as the YRBS. This study analyzed ABES data to examine correlates of perceived cognitive impairment among high school students in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Participants and Methods:The ABES was a one-time, online survey that was conducted to assess and evaluate the challenges that high-school aged youth experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic. Students’ perceived cognitive impairment was assessed using the same question used in the 2019 YRBS: 'Because of a physical, mental, or emotional problem, do you have serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions?' Response options were binary: 'Yes’ or 'No.' The students’ responses were evaluated in relation to nine adversity, mental health, and lifestyle variables.
Results:Participants were 6,992 students, age 14 to 18, with 3,294 boys (47%) and 3,698 girls (53%). A large proportion endorsed experiencing serious difficulties concentrating, remembering, and making decisions (45%). Girls (56%) were significantly more likely to endorse perceived cognitive impairment compared to boys (33%) [X2(1)=392.55, p<.001; OR=2.66, 95% CI=2.41-2.93]. Youth who reported that their mental health was poor most of the time or always were very likely to report perceived cognitive impairment (boys: 67%; girls: 81%). Binary logistic regressions were used to examine the associations between perceived cognitive impairment, adversity, and lifestyle variables while controlling for mental health. These analyses were conducted separately for boys [X2(9)=596.70, p<.001; Nagelkerke R2=.24] and girls [x2(9)=883.35, p<.001; Nagelkerke R2=.30]. After controlling for current mental health, significant independent predicters of cognitive problems in boys and girls included: a lifetime history of discrimination based on race or ethnicity, lifetime history of being sexually assaulted or abused, lifetime history of using illicit drugs, being bullied in the past year, current marijuana use, and getting insufficient sleep (5 of fewer hours per night). Participation in sports and exercising regularly were both independently associated with lower rates of cognitive impairment.
Conclusions:Perceived cognitive impairment was endorsed by a strikingly high percentage of high school students in 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic. More than half of high school aged girls and one third of boys reported having serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, and making decisions. These rates are considerably higher than in 2019. Current mental health, unfair treatment because of race or ethnicity, being sexually assaulted, being bullied, drug use, and insufficient sleep were associated with perceived cognitive impairment. Indicators of a physically active lifestyle (participation in sports and exercising regularly) were associated with lower rates of cognitive problems.
Longitudinal post-shunt outcomes in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus with and without comorbid Alzheimer’s disease
- Dov Gold, Caroline Wisialowski, Irene Piryatinsky, Paul Malloy, Stephen Correia, Stephen Salloway, Petra Klinge, Charles E. Gaudet, Madison Niermeyer, Athene Lee
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 29 / Issue 8 / October 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 14 December 2022, pp. 751-762
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- HTML
- Export citation
-
Objective:
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is highly comorbid with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) and may diminish the benefits of shunting; however, findings in this area are mixed. We examined postoperative outcomes, with emphases on cognition and utilization of novel scoring procedures to enhance sensitivity.
Methods:Using participant data from an iNPH outcome study at Butler Hospital, a mixed effect model examined main and interaction effects of time since surgery (baseline, 3 months, 12 months, and 24–60 months) and AD comorbidity (20 iNPH and 11 iNPH+AD) on activities of daily living (ADLs) and iNPH symptoms. Regression modeling explored whether baseline variables predicted improvements 3 months postoperatively.
Results:There were no group differences in gait, incontinence, and global cognition over time, and neither group showed changes in ADLs. Cognitive differences were observed postoperatively; iNPH patients showed stable improvements in working memory (p = 0.012) and response inhibition (p = 0.010), while iNPH + AD patients failed to maintain initial gains. Regarding predicting postoperative outcomes, baseline AD biomarkers did not predict shunt response at 3 months; however, older age at surgery predicted poorer cognitive outcomes (p = 0.04), and presurgical Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) (p = 0.035) and Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) scores (p = 0.009) predicted improvements incontinence.
Conclusion:iNPH + AD may be linked with greater declines in aspects of executive functioning postoperatively relative to iNPH alone. While baseline AD pathology may not prognosticate shunt response, younger age appears linked with postsurgical cognitive improvement, and utilizing both brief and comprehensive cognitive measures may help predict improved incontinence. These results illustrate the potential benefits of surgery and inform postoperative expectations for those with iNPH + AD.